Report: taxpayer-supported IVF has no impact on boosting overall fertility
Caroline MolloyA review of studies on the impact of subsidies such as taxpayer funds for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) on the fertility rate suggests there is no resulting surge in fertility, according to a report at the Institute for Family Studies (IFS).
Although the goal of helping people who struggle with infertility is a positive one, Lyman Stone, a senior fellow and director of IFS’ Pronatalism Initiative, also wrote in a report Thursday that taxpayer subsidies for IVF or government insurance mandates are likely not the way to go.
Stone’s review of studies on the impact of IVF subsidies on fertility came amid the Democrats’ attempt to vilify Republicans and, in particular, former President Donald Trump with the claim their lack of support for IVF is causing harm to people who want to have children.
Democratic nominee Kamala Harris used this talking point during the presidential debate Tuesday night. “Understand what has been happening under Donald Trump’s abortion ban: couples who pray and dream of having a family are denied IVF treatments,” she said, condemning those with ethical concerns about IVF.
Trump interjected: “Excuse me, I have to respond – another lie. I have been a leader on IVF … which is for fertility.”
